The Mechanism of NLP
People who have difficulty recovering from
physical illness perceive themselves as hopeless, helpless,
worthless,
and think they will remain unhealthy for ever. The
primary goal of the NLP practitioner is to move a person from his present state of discomfort to a desired state of health and
well-being by helping to reprogram beliefs about curing.
NLP practitioners ask questions to discover how
a client relates to issues of identity, personal beliefs, and life
goals. By reading autonomic body changes - skin color changes,
moisture changes on the lips or eyes - as well as other physiological
responses, NLP practitioners show people how to tap into their way
of curing, as individuals, based on how they process information
and how they view their health conditions.
Janet Konefal, Ph.D., of Miami, Florida,
says identity can be a major component of the way a person deals
with his or her health condition, particularly someone suffering
from chronic
disease. Dr. Konefal states that people often tend to identify
directly with their illnesses. A person doesn't usually say, ''I'm
John, who has this condition of diabetes,'' he says, ''I'm a
diabetic.'' The disease moves in and actually
shifts a person's identity.
One of the first priorities of an NLP
practitioner is to separate a person's negative or false
identifications and then to have that person recapture or regain his
identity.
NLP practitioners invented a term ecology check.
According to this method, special care is taken to keep not only a client's family, social,
and work relationships in balance, but also his internal
systems: thoughts, strategies, behaviors, capabilities, values, and
beliefs. It is used to clear up
if NLP will be compatible with a person's specific needs. It is
realized through the careful questioning of the individual
client both before and after a session.
As a next step, the practitioner will ask a
client to see himself in a state of health. By doing so, an
outcome is set that will facilitate the curing process. The brain's
natural response is to duplicate whatever /images or beliefs are
created about getting better.
The brain then triggers the necessary immunological responses to
guide the body toward its goal of health and well-being.
While asking questions about client's life and
condition, the NLP practitioner observes the language
patterns, eye movements, postures, muscle tension, and gestures.
These relay information and report internal sensations about how the
client relates to his present condition in both conscious and
unconscious ways, revealing what limiting beliefs may exist. These
belief structures can then be changed using NLP.
But Dr. Konefal warns that changing a person's belief structures is not
the only issue for NLP practitioners. He thinks what people need to achieve in order to become
healthy - to
actually make some changes in their health state - is not only a shift
in their beliefs, but a shift in their behavior. They need to have
adjustment at all levels, not
just a shift in beliefs. If they change their beliefs, but in fact
don't change any of their behavior, then there's an incongruency.
It's much more impactful if people tell themselves that they need to
eat better than if a doctor or health counselor tells them. They're
much more likely to listen to themselves.
The History of NLP
In the early 1970s, John Grinder, a professor
of linguistics at the University of California at Santa Cruz, and
Richard Bandler, a student of psychology and mathematics at Santa
Cruz, tried to define the qualities of
excellence in several accomplished individuals. They studied the
thinking processes, language patterns, and behavioral patterns of
Fritz Perls, father of Gestalt therapy; Virginia Satir, an
exceptional family psychotherapist; Milton Erickson, M.D., an
innovative hypnotherapist; and Gregory Bateson, a well-known British
anthropologist and writer on communication theories. As a result,
they discovered that many of the behavioral and psychological
elements that allowed these individuals to achieve excellence were
unconscious and intuitive and that the participants could not
describe their own exceptional qualities.
Grinder and Bandler, analyzing speaking patterns, voice tones,
and the selection of words, as well as the gesticulations, postures,
and eye movements of these individuals, made strong connections between body language and speaking
patterns. They then related this information to the internal
thinking process of each participant. Grinder and Bandler then trained themselves to assist people
experiencing emotional difficulties. They asked clients
about their problems and their body cues were observed as they
responded.
According to Grinder and Bandler, eye
movements, posture, voice tone, and breathing patterns reveal
unconscious patterns affecting a person's emotional state. Once
these unconscious patterns are distinguished, the client can be
assisted in adopting new patterns. From their work they devised a
method to teach others how to analyze a person's language, thoughts,
and behavior.
Engaging the Body's Natural Ability to Heal
Sarah had been severely allergic
to dairy products from her very childhood. Whenever they were ingested, she would almost
immediately experience sinus blockage, a sore throat, and stomach
pain, followed a day or two later by an outbreak of boils. As an
adult, Sarah had learned to carefully avoid all dairy products.
NLP practitioner Tim Hallbom asked Sarah to
think of something similar to a dairy product, yet something to
which she was not allergic. She chose tofu, a soybean product she
ate as a substitute for cheese. As Sarah thought of tofu, Hallbom
carefully observed her eye movements, skin color, muscle tones, and
breathing.
Sarah was then asked to think of a food that
would cause an allergic reaction. As she thought of cheese, Hallbom
observed the changes: her skin color became mottled, her muscle
tension changed, her eyes looked down and to the left (compared to
looking up and to the right when she thought about tofu). Hallbom
explains, when she thought of cheese her immune system reacted
as though the cheese was a foreign invader such as a virus. The
killer cells were called out, but as there was nothing to fight, they
attacked healthy cells. If this occured on a large scale, problems such
as those Sarah experienced might occur. Essentially what was
happening, however, was a mistaken overreaction of the immune system. On the
other hand, when Sarah thought of tofu, her body entered a different (healthy)
state, responded appropriately, and she felt fine.
Hallbom uses touch to create a positive
association to that healthy state. NLP practitioners call this an
"anchor" because it holds the positive state stable through a client's
nervous system. (Anchors can also be created using visual and
auditory methods, depending on the client's needs.) As Hallbom
anchored Sarah's positive state (associated with eating tofu), he
asked her to imagine herself in an audience watching a movie of
herself eating tofu, enjoying it, and seeing herself fully healthy.
Hallbom then asked Sarah to imagine that the
"Sarah" on the movie screen was eating cheese. In order
for her to have the full experience, he had her feel its texture,
taste, and smell. By using the anchor of touch to hold the tofu
state constant, it sent a message to Sarah: when she visualizes
herself eating the cheese, it's pleasing to her. In order to create
a bridge from this point into some future real-life experience,
Hallbom then had Sarah imagine a future time when she will eat
cheese.
When Sarah was able to hold the healthy state while imagining seeing
herself eating cheese on the movie screen, the path was clear for
the real change to occur. The "Sarah" in the movie and the
"Sarah" in the room were reassociated. In other words,
Sarah no longer imagined watching herself eating the cheese, but
rather imagined herself actually doing it. When Sarah was able to
hold the healthy "tofu" state while imagining that she was
actually eating the cheese, Hallbom knew the change had occurred.
Sarah has since been able to eat at least one dairy product every
day with no allergic response.